![]() ![]() The new options are good for those who aren’t ready. But now it has a chance to make a big leap. A slightly higher priced three month option is available for 6.95, and a two-year subscription now costs 44.95 (previously it was 47.95 ). As a result, Facebook brought photo sharing to the masses with a crucial people-tagging feature, while Instagram turned every smartphone owner into an obsessive hobbyist photographer. Today, computing power is ultracheap, and cameras are in every mobile device. It was a classic example of what's now called the "freemium"-free and premium-business model. So the restrictions made sense as a way to separate casual users who might scan and upload a few photos here and there from the hardcore fans willing to pay for unlimited photo storage and other perks. ![]() It's a tragic story: Yahoo had a chance to own photo sharing on the Web when it bought Flickr in 2005 (for a price that was reportedly about 0.03 Instagrams).īack then, Flickr had found a clever way to support itself: Selling Pro subscriptions, which appealed especially to amateur and professional photographers who were willing to laboriously upload high-resolution photos to the site.Īnd back then, servers and bandwidth were expensive. Account icon An icon in the shape of a person's head and shoulders.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |